RSS feed Add to your Facebook page LinkedIn Watch us on Youtube

Activity title

Modelling Cyber Domain Entities and Events within Distributed Simulations

Activity Reference

MSG-200

Panel

MSG

Security Classification

NATO UNCLASSIFIED

Status

Active

Activity type

RTG

Start date

2022-02-03T00:00:00Z

End date

2025-02-03T00:00:00Z

Keywords

Cyber Effects simulation, Distributed Simulation, Interoperability, LVC, Mission Training, Testing

Background

The last decade has seen a significant increase in the number and variety of cyber M&S research and development efforts. These efforts have resulted in methodologies and technologies for cyber training that are functionally relevant, but largely independent. Collaboration and standardization across these efforts is necessary to meet future cyber training demands, interoperability and re usability of simulators for the defence community. This activity follows on from the work of MSG-117, the MSG-151/IST-156 workshop, MSG-170, and MSG 188 that reported in 2015, 2017, 2019, and 2021 respectively. The report published by MSG-117 gave an informed high-level overview of how M&S might be used to support NATO Cyber Defence efforts. A key finding of MSG-117 and the workshop was that standards are an important but currently under exploited enabler for enabling linkages between cyber simulations and coalition force level simulations The report also concluded that there is currently little representation of cyber in campaign and mission level exercises and events, with existing effects being mainly limited to degrading or switching off C2. Whilst this can be a quick and effective way of creating a basic representation of the impact on a mission of a cyberattack, it does not cover the full range of potential impacts. One of the recommendations of the MSG-151/IST-156 workshop, that followed MSG-117, was to form an exploratory team to produce a “Top Ten” list of cyber effects/attacks/countermeasures and countereffects (in short: cyber events) that are most worth modelling. This became MSG-170 that reported on a methodology to select and prioritize cyber events relevant for the training and exercise at hand. The MSG-151/IST-156 Workshop also recommended forming an exploratory team to study the applicability of modifying commercial-off-the-shelf solutions to improve strategic decision support and to investigate gaps in the ability of Computer-Generated Forces (CGF) solutions to model cyber events. MSG-188 investigated how to fill this gap. MSG-188 followed and supported the SISO Product Development Group (PDG) that started in February 2020 to develop a Data Exchange Model (DEM) for M&S of cyber objects, attacks, and events. The proposed Task group activity will broaden this investigation and development.

Objectives

The Task Group (TG) will obtain insights from invited subject matter experts on the current status of research and best practices on how to achieve/implement effective representations in mission rehearsal and training. The TG will develop initial requirements for a NATO Cyber High Level Architecture (HLA) Federation Object Model (FOM) module. Experimental versions of such a module will be implemented and tested in selected use-cases. Expected deliverables are: • NATO contributions to the development and certification of the SISO Cyber DEM and HLA FOM. • Initial capability tests and demonstrations of a draft implementation of an HLA Cyber FOM module with gateways and tools to introduce effects of cyber events into Mission Training through Distributed Simulation (MTDS) environments. • A concise technical report and draft STANAG for adoption of the SISO HLA Cyber FOM. The draft STANAG will be aligned with TG MSG-191 on ‘’NATO Standards for Federated Simulation and Services for Integration, Verification and Certification’’

Topics

1. Identification of NATO-relevant use-cases to guide the development of the SISO Cyber DEM and a Cyber FOM module that corresponds to identified simulation needs on tactical, strategic and operational levels regarding cyber events in the context of: a. training and exercising of commands staffs b. testing and evaluation of methods and tools c. verification and validation of military capabilities d. mission planning e. military course of action analysis 2. Investigate how to introduce effective and credible representations and GUI elements of cyber effects into MTDS and test environments. Connect to related activities by industry partners and members of the SISO Cyber DEM PDG for the development of cyber key / hybrid terrains for MTDS. 3. Demonstrate M&S of cyber events in joint and combined exercises.

Contact Panel Office